The Times recommends ...
Barack Obama for president
As president, Barack Obama can get America moving forward again.
"An economic Katrina is shattering the confidence of hardworking, middle-class Americans. The war that should never have been in Iraq is dragging on too long. At a time of huge challenge, the candidate with the intelligence, temperament and judgment to lead our nation to a better place is Sen. Barack Obama.
Obama should be the next president of the United States because he is the most qualified change agent. Obama is a little young, but also brilliant. If he sometimes seems brainy and professorial, that's OK. We need the leader of the free world to think things through, carefully. We have seen the sorry results of shooting from the hip."
...
"McCain is at heart a deregulator. But it is the hands-off and ineffective federal regulatory system that allowed this mess to fester. Obama offered a more coherent approach months ago when he called for regulating investment banks, mortgage brokers and hedge funds and streamlining overlapping regulatory agencies.
Our country is on the wrong track. Average, middle-class citizens have lost confidence that if they work hard, they can improve their lives, afford to send their kids to college and not be tossed out of their homes.
American optimism has been wracked by President George Bush and a previous Republican Congress. If you want change, you do not keep what is essentially the same team in power. You try something different. You vote for the stronger matchup, Obama and Sen. Joseph Biden, a smart and steady hand on foreign policy and other matters."
(The rest of the article can be found here:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2008190671_obama... )
BONUS
Conservative Wick Allison, former editor and publisher of National Review, endorses Obama.
A Conservative for Obama
My party has slipped its moorings. It’s time for a true pragmatist to lead the country.
"Barack Obama is not my ideal candidate for president. (In fact, I made the maximum donation to John McCain during the primaries, when there was still hope he might come to his senses.) But I now see that Obama is almost the ideal candidate for this moment in American history. I disagree with him on many issues. But those don’t matter as much as what Obama offers, which is a deeply conservative view of the world. Nobody can read Obama’s books (which, it is worth noting, he wrote himself) or listen to him speak without realizing that this is a thoughtful, pragmatic, and prudent man. It gives me comfort just to think that after eight years of George W. Bush we will have a president who has actually read the Federalist Papers.
Most important, Obama will be a realist. I doubt he will taunt Russia, as McCain has, at the very moment when our national interest requires it as an ally. The crucial distinction in my mind is that, unlike John McCain, I am convinced he will not impulsively take us into another war unless American national interests are directly threatened.
'Every great cause,' Eric Hoffer wrote, 'begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket.' As a cause, conservatism may be dead. But as a stance, as a way of making judgments in a complex and difficult world, I believe it is very much alive in the instincts and predispositions of a liberal named Barack Obama."
More of the article is here:
http://www.dmagazine.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?nm=Core+Pages&type=gen&mod=Core+... )

Nicole Farhi
"I now see that Obama is almost the ideal candidate for this moment in American history. I disagree with him on many issues. But those don’t matter as much as what Obama offers, which is a deeply conservative view of the world. Nobody can read Obama’s books (which, it is worth noting, he wrote himself) or listen to him speak without realizing that this is a thoughtful, pragmatic, and prudent man." Exactly Wick Allison. Thank you.
1I like Barack and I hope it wins it with no problems.
2Dwight D. Eisenhower's granddaughter who is a life long republican has decided to support Obama. She was on CNN on Thursday morning. I hope this is a start of a popular trend!!!
3What wonderful journalism. I think it is shameful how publications are choosing to back one candidate over the other. Don't they realize that that alienates them from half their audience? Whatever happened to just journalism. And I have this problem for both candidates so before anyone jumps that just because it Obama I am upset. I don't think a news outlet, especially a newspaper, should endorse one party or candidate.
4carrie, love your new avatar
5GS, newspapers always back candidates. The Dallas Morning News endorsed Bush for both elections.
6I know, that is my local paper. I still don't like it. Did you read what I wrote?
7Yes I read what you wrote.
8I see your point I think the media should be "fair and balanced" as some of them claim to be. But unfortunately it's not.
9Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.