John McCain's campaign is looking for a scapegoat. It is looking for someone to blame if McCain loses on Tuesday.
And it has decided on Sarah Palin.

In recent days, a McCain “adviser” told Dana Bash of CNN: “She is a diva. She takes no advice from anyone.”
Imagine not taking advice from the geniuses at the McCain campaign. What could Palin be thinking?
Also, a “top McCain adviser” told Mike Allen of Politico that Palin is “a whack job.”
Maybe she is. But who chose to put this “whack job” on the ticket? Wasn’t it John McCain? And wasn’t it his first presidential-level decision?

And if you are a 72-year-old presidential candidate, wouldn’t you expect that your running mate’s fitness for high office would come under a little extra scrutiny? And, therefore, wouldn’t you make your selection with care? (To say nothing about caring about the future of the nation?)
McCain didn’t seem to care that much. McCain admitted recently on national TV that he “didn’t know her well at all” before he chose Palin.
But why not? Why didn’t he get to know her better before he made his choice?
It’s not like he was rushed. McCain wrapped up the Republican nomination in early March. He didn’t announce his choice for a running mate until late August.
Wasn’t that enough time for McCain to get to know Palin? Wasn’t that enough time for his crackerjack “vetters” to investigate Palin’s strengths and weaknesses, check through records and published accounts, talk to a few people, and learn that she was not only a diva but a whack job diva?

But McCain picked her anyway. He wanted to close the “enthusiasm gap” between himself and Barack Obama. He wanted to inject a little adrenaline into the Republican National Convention. He wanted to goose up the Republican base.
And so he chose Palin. Is she really a diva and a whack job? Could be. There are quite a few in politics. (And a few in journalism, too, though in journalism they are called “columnists.”)
As proof that she is, McCain aides now say Palin is “going rogue” and straying from their script. Wow. What a condemnation. McCain sticks to the script. How well is he doing?
In truth, Palin’s real problem is not her personality or whether she takes orders well. Her real problem is that neither she nor McCain can make a credible case that Palin is ready to assume the presidency should she need to.
And that undercuts McCain’s entire campaign.

This was the deal McCain made with the devil. In exchange for energizing his base by picking Palin, he surrendered his chief selling point: that he was better prepared to run the nation in time of crisis, whether it be economic, an attack by terrorists or, as he has been talking about in recent days, fending off a nuclear war.
“The next president won’t have time to get used to the office,” McCain told a crowd in Miami on Wednesday. “I’ve been tested, my friends, I’ve been tested.”
But has Sarah Palin?
I don’t believe running mates win or lose elections, though some believe they can be a drag on the ticket. Lee Atwater, who was George H.W. Bush’s campaign manager in 1988, told me that Dan Quayle cost the ticket 2 to 3 percentage points. But Bush won the election by 7.8 percentage points.
So, in Atwater’s opinion, Bush survived his bad choice by winning the election on his own.
McCain could do the same thing. But his campaign’s bad decisions have not stopped with Sarah Palin. It has made a series of questionable calls, including making Joe the Plumber the embodiment of the campaign.

Are voters really expected to warmly embrace an (unlicensed) plumber who owes back taxes and complains about the possibility of making a quarter million dollars a year?
And did McCain’s aides really believe so little in John McCain’s own likeability that they thought Joe the Plumber would be more likable?
Apparently so. Which is sad.
We in the press make too much of running mates and staff and talking points and all the rest of the hubbub that accompanies a campaign.
In the end, it comes down to two candidates slugging it out.
Either McCain pulls off a victory in the last round or he doesn’t.
And if he doesn’t, he has nobody to blame but himself.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/15073;_ylt=AvGZfc0qmGZvvQnSk5zbYOLXn414
This is why we all must vote. John McCain has too many personal issues already. Who doesn't look into whom they are choosing as a running mate?

Jipepe
Hafize Ozbudak
Zagliani
This kind of upsets me. McCain should be to blame for his own failures. After all, it was he who chose her.
1Well -- when you flaunt yourself as a Maverick -- you need to take both the good and the bad that comes with it -- as in taking responsibility for your own actions -- being -- like -- accountable and all.
[McCain should be to blame for his own failures. ]
2Exactly! This goes to that mans judgement. Like I said when she popped up on the scene -- Millions of people chose Obama - one man chose Palin!
I actually feel sorry for Palin (can that be????)
3You feel sorry for Palin? Why is that?
4[You feel sorry for Palin? Why is that?]
Because McCain knew she was a bad choice from "get". He used her plain and simple because he has some skewed, backwards view that tells him that women voters will now flock to him.
TRUE (!!!!) -- Palin is an opportunist -- she knew she wasn't qualified for the position, but still jumped on it to advance her career -- her mistake. And TRUE (!!!), she totally allowed herself to be used. She knew of McCain's intentions -- she alluded to it in her acceptance speech with that "18 million cracks" line.
But McCain, with all his "experience", should have known better. He should have chose someone that would help him run the country - instead of someone that he thought would help him win. This is why a VERY TINY part of me feel sorry for her.
Palin is in WAY over her head and they are throwing her under the bus.
5I called it so long ago. I've made posts about this. Knew it would be the outcome. McCain's decision to pick Palin is the boldest move I've ever seen by a presidential candidate. Either it would be the greatest move in the history of US politics or the absolute worst and the final nail in the coffin for his campaign.
6Ick I don't feel sorry for that woman, she turns my stomach. It doesn't surprise me one bit that the McCAin camp might fault her if they lose the election, look at their tact on how they are painting Obama. Figures they would turn on each other. But you know what? He chose her, so what does that say about his decisions? He made a poor, irrational, probably spontaneous decision and why would I want a president like that?
I think it is true that in most cases, a Vice President choice doesn't matter that much when you are voting. You vote for the President. However, in this case, when you have a 72 year old cancer survivor (I think I"m correct that he is the oldest person ever running for office?) who is not disclosing all his medical records, then ABSOLUTELY the VP pick needs to be given major attention.
7Oh -- trust me blue -- the empathy I feel is one I would feel for anyone -- for my fellow man -- but I can't stand the woman.
8Palin is a liar. She is divisive, uneducated, and ambitious to the point of being a danger to this country. And she all but said she is looking at 2012!
If she is being thrown under a bus right now it's to the benefit of us all. She has no business running for VP and quite frankly I do not think she is suited for political office in Alaska (God I can hear the way she says that word and it makes me cringe
) either.
Sorry I just had to get that off my chest
9Wait - what? You mean she wants to run for President in 2012?
10I see what you're saying, and still there are so many people that are really stoked about her. I agree that she's a major diva.
11I love that second pic, lol.
Please don't let her run for president!
I am so glad they didn't win.
12Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.